I watched an interview with Stephen Fry today where he discussed climate change. I don't have a transcript, so this is not verbatim, but the gist of his view was this. Most of us live our lives as though there is a hell, even those who don't exactly believe in it. Just in case. When we die, if there is no hell, well then there's oblivion and we are no worse off. If there is a hell, then we've dodged that bullet.
If we live our lives in a way that will stop the effects of climate change, and it turns out that climate change is a myth, what will we be left with? A planet with less pollution, a smaller carbon footprint, and a nicer place to live all round! This is a fantastic way of looking at it. If the politicians made these goals the priority, rather than fighting over whether climate change really exists or not, we will all win. Surely that's more important than being right.
I write about anything that elicits a strong reaction in me about the world. Injustice, lack of common sense, and particularly stupid things. When I have an opinion, it's usually a pretty strong one!!
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Idiots on our roads
I was watching one of those police reality shows the other night and they showed a man who, about 7 years ago, was driving drunk and killed a 10 year old girl. I think he went to jail back then for a short time, and one of his bail conditions was that he couldn't drink and they suspended his licence. On this show, he was picked up by the police - driving and drunk - three times over the limit. So, what did the courts give him? A 9 month sentence, suspended for one year. They also added more time to his licence suspension. BIG DEAL! This is a serial offender who has been caught driving many times before, and the cameras caught him driving again after his court appearance. To me, that's it. He's gone. Throw him in jail and throw away the key. He obviously has no respect for the law, no respect for himself and his family, and absolutely no respect for the rest of us. What's it going to take before the court gets tough on him? Does someone else need to die? Because it's for sure that he won't kill himself in a crash - that just doesn't happen.
There's another side to this story. If he's driving on a suspended licence, whose car is he driving? He should not be allowed to have a car registered in his name while the suspension is in place. In fact, I believe it should be taken off him completely. Either impounded or he can transfer it into a relative's name. Then, if he is caught driving, that car is impounded immediately. You can't tell me that his friends and family don't know he is suspended, and if they allow him to drive, they deserve to lose their car. Unless they can prove that they didn't know (which would be almost impossible to do), they should also lose the right to have a car at all. It's harsh, I know, but it seems to me to be the only way we can stop these dickheads driving on the road with me and my child. As I said in a previous post, if the reason they don't go to jail is because of overcrowding, then get the white collar criminals out and put idiots like this in.
There's another side to this story. If he's driving on a suspended licence, whose car is he driving? He should not be allowed to have a car registered in his name while the suspension is in place. In fact, I believe it should be taken off him completely. Either impounded or he can transfer it into a relative's name. Then, if he is caught driving, that car is impounded immediately. You can't tell me that his friends and family don't know he is suspended, and if they allow him to drive, they deserve to lose their car. Unless they can prove that they didn't know (which would be almost impossible to do), they should also lose the right to have a car at all. It's harsh, I know, but it seems to me to be the only way we can stop these dickheads driving on the road with me and my child. As I said in a previous post, if the reason they don't go to jail is because of overcrowding, then get the white collar criminals out and put idiots like this in.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Linguistics
I'm currently studying Linguistics at university and I've discovered something terrible! I love the English language and hate when people misuse it. But, as a linguist, I can no longer get mad when someone says 'yous' or 'I seen that movie'. It is seen as simply different ways of saying things. As a person though, I can still wince when I hear them. Until I actually work as a linguist, I will continue to despair at the way language is (mis)used. Once I'm qualified, I will grit my teeth and inwardly cringe.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Jon Venables
I know it's in England, not Australia, but this is a world wide issue. Why was Jon Venables face not able to be shown to anyone but the judge? I understood why they did that when he was first released from prison - I believe everyone has the right to a second chance. But that's it. If you blow that chance, goodbye, back to jail, never to be released. Jon Venables blew his chance. Child pornography is one of the most heinous crimes anyone can commit. It's right up there behind murder, rape and child molestation. If we're not going to throw them in jail and throw away the key, then anyone found guilty of this charge needs to have his or her face shown on every media outlet possible, worldwide. Their names should be immediately added to any sex offender register available. We need to protect our children.
This brings me to serial offenders of any crime. I believe there are jurisdictions where everyone has three strikes. Third strike, no matter how minor the charge, you're back in jail. I love it! As long as they stay in jail. How often does that happen though? Overcrowding is often cited as the main reason criminals are released early. Well, I don't know about other countries, but in Australia, there are people in jail for 'white' collar crimes - tax evasion, etc. Alan Bond and Glenn Wheatley come to mind. If jails are overcrowded, why are these people in there? They didn't physically hurt anyone. They may have defrauded the tax system or shareholders, but how is putting them in jail where they can't earn any money to pay it back, going to help anyone? Give them community service, preferably with the kind of people who were hurt by their actions so they can really see what they've done. Stop putting those like Glenn Wheatley in jail for two years, and letting idiots who drink drive or consistently speed, get suspended sentences, which means they're back on the road - the same roads I drive on. How is this fair? But that's another rant for another time ...
This brings me to serial offenders of any crime. I believe there are jurisdictions where everyone has three strikes. Third strike, no matter how minor the charge, you're back in jail. I love it! As long as they stay in jail. How often does that happen though? Overcrowding is often cited as the main reason criminals are released early. Well, I don't know about other countries, but in Australia, there are people in jail for 'white' collar crimes - tax evasion, etc. Alan Bond and Glenn Wheatley come to mind. If jails are overcrowded, why are these people in there? They didn't physically hurt anyone. They may have defrauded the tax system or shareholders, but how is putting them in jail where they can't earn any money to pay it back, going to help anyone? Give them community service, preferably with the kind of people who were hurt by their actions so they can really see what they've done. Stop putting those like Glenn Wheatley in jail for two years, and letting idiots who drink drive or consistently speed, get suspended sentences, which means they're back on the road - the same roads I drive on. How is this fair? But that's another rant for another time ...
Monday, July 19, 2010
Fair pay for police
There's an ad on tv in Queensland about all of the public servants getting a 4% pay rise. All, that is, except for those who do the hardest job of all. No, I'm not talking about those desk bound jockeys whose biggest threat is RSI, I'm talking about the boys and girls in blue. Why is this even an issue? The answer is simple. These are the people that protect us - they are not the ones that put the assholes back on the street - that's the court system. Any time there is a pay rise for public servants, the police get the same rise ... plus another 1%. They're worth it.
Imagine doing your job every day, thinking that project was finished and you could move on to the next one, only to find that same project on your desk the next day, ready for you to start all over. Would you feel as though you'd achieved something? And that only affects you (and maybe your loved ones if you took your frustration home). Some of these assholes that the court system spews back into society, affect all of us in some way.
So Anna Bligh, when you finally realise your mistake and give the police the pay rise they deserve, how about you look into sentencing. Let's start seeing the punishment fit the crime.
Imagine doing your job every day, thinking that project was finished and you could move on to the next one, only to find that same project on your desk the next day, ready for you to start all over. Would you feel as though you'd achieved something? And that only affects you (and maybe your loved ones if you took your frustration home). Some of these assholes that the court system spews back into society, affect all of us in some way.
So Anna Bligh, when you finally realise your mistake and give the police the pay rise they deserve, how about you look into sentencing. Let's start seeing the punishment fit the crime.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)